Friday, December 16, 2011

Lawyer refuses to respond to complaint




The first member of the Law Society to respond to a request to justify their decision by providing a legal basis for their decision to allow my bankruptcy was Ken Johnston., which is not surprising given the close association between Mr Johnston and Roger Chapman in several mediation organizations.





Kenneth Johnston is the Chairman of a goverment approved organisation to resolve financial disputes and one would imagine that he should be able to provide an answer to a challenge of his own integrity. http://www.fscl.org.nz/

A news item referring to the above can be found at http://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?id=82635

Mr Johnston's reply..........



Kenneth Johnston, Barrister
Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:42 AM
To: Mary Ollivier
Cc: jcreser@gmail.com
Reply Reply to all Forward Print Delete Show original
Here is an email I have received from Mr Creser. I will not, of course, be replying.

Kenneth Johnston.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Law Society Complaint

Off to the New Zealand Law Society with a complaint that the committee itself had brought the NZLS into disrepute.

email to mary.ollivier@lawsociety.org.nz

Hello Mary,

Thanks for the advice regarding the lawyers responsible for resolving complaints against Roger Chapman that he;





  1. Charged the estate for responding to complaints


  2. Refused disclosure relating to evidence that the person holding my late mothers enduring power of attorney had falsified the accounts.


  3. Took payment by deduction from my estate to fund a bankruptcy action against me.


  4. Prepared false affidavits claiming that my mothers executors held no security on my behalf. and were entitled to bankrupt me.


  5. Mislead the court regarding my status as discretionary beneficiary.


  6. Acted without title in respect of property, ie: before executors had probate of will.
As discussed, Mr Chapman s actions are contrary to every established trust law principal and the advice provided by the Law Society's own legal practice manual. Likewise it is contrary to the principals of natural justice to have solicitors on the committee who have acted for parties opposing me in the past and in particular Ollie Gilbert, who shared an office with Mr Chapman.

This complaint is therefore directed at the individual members of the committee named below, who have by their actions brought the society into disrepute by condoning actions of Mr Chapman, which are contrary to proper legal practice as set down by the Law Society in the Legal Practice Manual Vol 6, on estates wills and trusts. The consequences of this shameful action has led to me becoming the first person in nearly 300 years to be bankrupted at the hands of the executor of a mutual estate.

Please refer this complaint to -

Wayne Chapman, Ken Johnston, Hamish Woods, Mary Jeffcoat,Lance Pratley.



Helen Croft, Ken Johnston, Nigel Hughes, Hayden Wilson, Ollie Gilbert, Quentin Davies, Mike Turner

I have forwarded this complaint to the lay persons concerned, Catherine Hannan and Ruth Procter, & invite your suggestions as to an appropriate way forward.To begin, I would ask that the solicitors named be asked to provide a single equitable precedent supporting the executor of a mutual estate bankrupting a beneficiary or otherwise concede an error.

Kind regards,

Letter acknowleging security